English is the official language
of the conference; the paper should be written and presented only in
The selection panel of the conference
committee will consider all papers or abstract received by the
submission deadline to ensure that the proposed submission is
relevant to the Conference.
Abstract selection notifications
will be sent out to relevant authors within five working days
All papers will be double-blind peer
reviewed by members of the conference committee to ensure an
adequate standard, that the proposed subject of the submission has
been followed, that the paper is of a suitable length, the standard
of English is adequate and the paper is appropriately referenced.
For authors whose first language is not
English, we request that you have your work proof-read prior to
submission by a native English speaker (or at least a fluent English
speaker). If you do not have access to an appropriate person, you
may like to consider our proof-reading service. Papers can be
rejected due to a poor standard of English.
Papers that are accepted will be
published in the conference proceedings providing at least one
author completes registration (including payment). see the
registration section of the conference website for more information
about registration. The conference proceedings is a book published
with an ISBN.
After submission, authors agree to the
review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review
process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified
experts in the field selected by the committee, who will give
All papers are reviewed using a
single-blind review process: authors declare their names and
affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but
reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors
receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript.
Plagiarism is totally unacceptable to ICPST.
Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the
authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of
others. The authors have to clearly identify both their own
contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they
depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following
acts of sanction will be taken:
Reject the article submitted or delete
the article from the final publications.
Report the authors violation to his/her
supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
Report the authors violation to the
appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research
Reserve the right to publish the authors
name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated
institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.
After you received the formal notification
letter, you can follow steps below to finish registration.
If the paper cannot match the topics or
unqualified, rejection mail will be mailed.
After the paper pass two round of
reviewing process, formal acceptance letter will be mailed including
review form with comments etc.
Please re-edit and improve paper quality
according to review comments carefully.